View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:46 AM
ThickasaBrick ThickasaBrick is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Guys, it could very well be that the rubber technology of the day prevented them from building an actuator that could last without the extra cooling means that they employed to help it live. I would reconsider and go ahead with one of the two original plans. ALL of the car companies are disgustingly cheap. They wouldn't have gone through the trouble of that more complicated setup if it wasn't necessary. I'm sure they found out through testing that they had a problem, which is why we have this more costly for them to build more complicated setup. (Even just an extra 50 cents per car sends the bean counters into a tizzy!)
Regards, Eric
__________________
"I've had the car upside down and still been steering trying to correct it" - R. Petty
89 300E "Benzer1" 15.924 Uncorrected
88 300E "Benzer2"
93 400E "Benzer3" 14.200 U.C.
95 E420 "Benzer4"
92 300E "Benzer5" 16.299 U.C. Future turbo CNG
85 Volvo 744 D24T "Bolbo1"
90 Volvo 745 T "Bolbo2"
94 Volvo 854 T "Bolbo3"
01 Volvo S40 1.9T "Bolbo4"
85 Dodge F.B. tow rig "Festus"
71 AMC Javelin AMX 401 "Sidewinder"
74 AMC Hornet 401 "C.K.10" 13.63 U.C.
74 Bricklin SV1 "Presto" AMC 360 pwrd.
Reply With Quote